This is another entry from my old (and soon to be expiring) website. I suspect that it's pretty much guaranteed to mess up my formatting since it begins with a large table (that fit fine on my old page, but I'm a little more *pushes out with each elbow* confined over here).
This post was originally made in the Winter of 2001 and some of the cartoons hold a bit more irony today than they probably did back then.
oh, and again, no promises on the links.
| | | | | |
| | |
Transportation 101
Medical Effects
* Walkers have less incidence of cancer, heart disease, stroke, diabetes and other killer diseases.
* smog can cause birth defects
* living near auto factories creates a higher likelihood of children having cancer
* more people are being killed by air pollution from traffic than from traffic crashes each year (and again) (and again)
* auto exhaust can lead to respiratory ailments
* tire dust can lead to rhinitis (runny nose), conjunctivitis (tearful eyes), to hives (urticaria), bronchial asthma, and occasionally even a life-threatening condition called anaphylactic shock
(and again)
* tire dust can build sensitivities to latex (and again)
* auto traffic stirs up pollens and molds and may therefore worsen asthma and hay fever
* ground level ozone can irritate the respiratory system, reduce lung function, aggravate asthma, and/or inflame and damage the lining of the lung (and again)
* nationally there are approximately 18.1 auto-accident-related deaths per 100,000 people (and again)
* Compared with other vehicle types, utility vehicles experienced the highest rollover rates: 37.8 percent in fatal crashes, 10.0 percent in injury crashes, and 2.5 percent in property-damage-only crashes.
* healthier employees are often happier and more productive (and again) (and again)
Environmental Effects (which often lead to Medical Effects)
* oil spills and leaks destroy the environment and may be closer than you think (more) (still more) (and a little more)
* air pollution is causing problems in national parks
* auto manufacturing produces great quantities of pollutants
* SUV's are allowed, by law, to produce more pollutants than passenger cars
* SUV's get crappy gas mileage (compare the gas mileage for cars page to the best and worst of SUV's page)
|
|
It's either RVs or Segways.
ReplyDeleteThere doesn't seem to be a middle ground.
Meg, the table formatting needs work, though.
Aloha mai Nai`a, rider of buses (with a car in the garage).
:-P it's looking ok on my end so i doubt i'll bother with it.
ReplyDeletei don't feel so attached to these old posts that i want them to look perfect, but i do feel sentimental enough that i don't want to let them die when my website does.
of course, with multiply's home base in florida, all it might take is a poorly placed hurricane and everything will be gone anyway. oh, well.
btw, have you ever heard of the Megway? ;-)
In terms of how many miles you can go, I think that $250 bicycle will last quite a lot longer than the $25 shoes. My bike was $1200 or so, but I have had it for 8 years, in which time it has not required much in the way of additional expenditures. My shoes wear out rather quickly.
ReplyDeleteyeah, i should probably multiply the shoe cost by something to account for replacements.
ReplyDeletefor now you'll have to use your imagination.
add the cost of spending two days walking to and from work...
ReplyDeletewell, there's the whole "new urbanism" aspect to this too.
ReplyDeletewhere can i get one? "The low cost of purchase and operation, along with the large towing and carrying capacity, ...each Megway is capable of carrying up to 120 pounds in its front cargo compartment in the form of either boxes or bags. The optional broom, mop, and floor buffing attachments (not shown) turn Megway into a powerful cleaning machine."
ReplyDeletewe've got one.
ReplyDeleteit works pretty well except when there's an idle computer nearby. ;-)
yeah, urban planning is almost an oxymoron.
ReplyDeleteeveryone wants a house with a miniature 17th century landscape garden.
no one wants to consider where that's taking us.
the answers were proposed 100 years ago, almost.
oy.
(i own a house in suburbia myself, and drive 1500 miles / month, at like 25 mpg...)
They had telecommuting 100 years ago? Wow!
ReplyDeleteok, there have been new answer added to the list since then...
ReplyDeleteand i was maybe exaggerating a little.
I'm a walker baby :)
ReplyDeleteWow shoes, pushbikes and cars are cheap where you live.
ReplyDeleteah, that will be in my next post from my expiring site. ;-)
ReplyDeletewhen we moved to fort collins from san francisco, the lawn was one of the things that hit us hard. we couldn't get over the fact that we were actually expected to water something that didn't flower and didn't feed us.
well, you can certainly spend more on these things. or less.
ReplyDeletehow much does the average car cost in australia?
rob bought a 2000 toyota corolla a few years back (3 years ago?) for $6000. what would that have been out there?
Average price for a new 6 cylinder sedan would be around $35,000. That Toyot Corolla would have cost around $24,000 here.
ReplyDeleteany idea what the exchange rate is right now? would that account for some of the difference?
ReplyDeleteconsidering the tariffs we have on foreign cars and the extra distance they have to travel to get here, you'd think toyotas would be cheaper there.
Toyota is probably one of the cheaper cars here in Oz, they used to be partners with Holden. Mind you I don't keep up with the price of cars anymore. All I know is the one I like is up in the $30,000 range, or they were. I love Holdens..The first car I ever drove was a EH holden V8 (owned by my first husband) My ex had modified it and it was HOT hehe...well was at the time..typical teenagers hey?? Here in Oz there are basically two car owners (well used to be) one is Holden owners Yay woo hooo best car in the world...the others are Ford owners boooo yuckypoos ewwww terrible cars..our son told us he is thinking of buying a Ford..wellll we told him not to bother driving it up our drive hehe
ReplyDeleteJust to provide a balanced argument, don't forget to figure in other factors such as jobs for workers in companies that make the shoes, bikes, automobiles, oil, gasoline, steel, etc. This is what the government quotes again and again for benefits to the economy and is why the electric car is being suppressed.
ReplyDeleteso a car is better, according to the workers argument, because it takes more people to make it? but i don't get why the electric car would be supressed by that argument.
ReplyDeleteAlthough the automakers have the technology to make electric cars, development and deployment is being stifled by people in the industry with a hand in the oil industry. See "Who Killed the Electric Car?" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car%3F) for more on that.
ReplyDeleteThey forgot about the rolling brown-outs. Silicon Valley was (and still is) very excited about alternative fuel technologies. The electric vehicles were looking very promising. We started seeing electric vehicle recharging stations pop up at various stores (although there were two competing types of recharging stations, which didn't help matters). But then we ran out of electricity. Between the mega data centers sucking up tons of power and PG&E having their price gouging scandal, electric vehicles just became impractical. There was just not enough electricity to go around. I think that the power shortage here killed the electric vehicle in this area more than anything else.
ReplyDeletethe other problem with an electric car is that it's still using some form of energy. i don't remember where electricity comes from in cali (other than from the windmills down south) but here most of our electricity is either from coal (thanks to wyoming) or natural gas. there are some wind powered stations and probably some water powered stations as well, but coal is king in colorado still.
ReplyDeleteMy jeep runs on soul power :/
ReplyDeleteYou can also convert your car to gas. I dont know if its cleaner or not but gas costs about half what petrol does.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your stance on wind farms Meg?
ReplyDeletei don't know what i think about wind farms. it seems like a good source of energy, especially around these parts where it's often windy.
ReplyDeletebut i've heard that birds often fly into the things. :-(
Well that is the controversy of wind farms here in Oz. People reckon birds are killed by them. Personally I think that the "cleaner" electricity is better for the entire world than "conventional" sources of electricity. But what do I know? I'm no expert on the subject but it gets my goat up that people are worried about a few bloody birds dying when millions of both animals, humans and this wonderful earth are dying from radiation poisoning and global warming. Honestly the *turbines don't turn that fast, well the ones down the road don't anyways.
ReplyDelete*not sure what they are called.
Awesome!!
ReplyDelete